[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Relakks
- From: coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:28:47 -0800
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Delivery-date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:29:34 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=SoMPi2S1QpUx0j6Iefanjli1FgeDnApAQeYBeSq7QQkORRKSnQU8JfrcdRS9//oQ2FfQogKCrr9y++Pl1vM3GEoBOBy1oPK6RRb5QK60BRjG7Lp07w8gfIlhso05o385sARYPiWly93iQKbCDsWBwAsF9YhaOkimSNBqV7OSK0c=
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 11/30/06, Tony <Tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If they use Relakks they they can make it much harder for the US governement to watch them - and get decent speed too - unlike with TOR!
let me make this really clear:
Relakks and other single hop proxies are trivial to observe for an
adversary correlating traffic. Such services make it MUCH EASIER, not
harder, for governments to watch. they also introduce a single point
of failure and require full trust in this third party.
Tor is slower than Relakks because it provides stronger anonymity,
which is a feature, not a bug.