[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[OT] Re: U.S. begins censoring Internet at U.K.'s request
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [OT] Re: U.S. begins censoring Internet at U.K.'s request
- From: Curious Kid <letsshareinformation@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 13:10:21 -0800 (PST)
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 16:17:11 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1289164221; bh=YDLb4+Idpcu1Y3C7WsS1QoSi9pTSVNqDd2+ipz71tFY=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=V9eoo4Xl9mNmGYYUlCTeSv+Zfn6d8x7otHN1ClOO83UZnL1AE915mr0ajZzw6464N05Ny0ruxbd67dC5K8mIv+R3gfTSeuXzYU4dBmx/HHYPkH31GiaUf47MfT5KUi4dOqe0E/20Bpz5d5v1Gx1PUh9P3rfbZ50OS/JCuScRJT8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MUO20Q946k0dfH9194T9bAZ7uT3rL77YG19LgpKC36pTgKLGK6hOk7rUtCmkRsYsAeK/+UQ51z8UTP5ew8UJUUbRIRTJrGQeAbO43Vq0BzPrhF9O6lFxYyT58CwJ6qyH5O9zK+QgTPdpI/km1frBsJ+S2awmd2N1ktBj5aWi94I=;
- In-reply-to: <4CD6EDA3.9010301@xxxxxxxxx>
- References: <201011061802.oA6I2Mjq008309@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CD6EDA3.9010301@xxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message ----
> From: F. Fox <kitsune.or@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Sun, November 7, 2010 7:19:15 PM
> Subject: Re: U.S. begins censoring Internet at U.K.'s request
>
> It's awful soon to be saying it's war, given it's one website. It could
> just be an error of some kind, or someone could have taken the site
> offline on their end.
>
> It's just something I was taught: Don't be quick to imply malice on the
> part of others, since mistakes are far more common.
>
A site going down after a takedown request is more likely than it actually being
taken down? We should play cards sometime...
Here is more, this time from CNN, except CNN presents net censorship as a good
thing.
http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/11/05/uk.lawmaker.hit.list/?hpt=T2
CNN has targeted that website for a long time. A search yields several CNN
results that rebuke the site. Here is a Google cache of claims from the site
operator that CNN aired different questions than the ones he was asked during a
telephone interview.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:FV_0VxaglCIJ:www.revolutionmuslim.com/2010/10/press-release-by-anjem-choudary.html+revolutionmuslim+cnn&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&client=firefox-a
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/