[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: BetterPrivacy - necessary?

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: BetterPrivacy - necessary?
From: andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 20:27:18 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 20:27:24 -0400
In-reply-to: <4CA652CC.2060203@xxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <4CA38336.8090105@xxxxxxxxx> <4CA41694.6060700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CA652CC.2060203@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 10:29:48PM +0100, pumpkin@xxxxxxxxx wrote 0.5K bytes in 12 lines about:
: I concur but doesn't TorButton do all this suppression?
: 
: That said: what was the rationale in moving from Privoxy to Polipo?
: Did it happen because TorButton became standard?

https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#WhydoweneedPolipoorPrivoxywithTorWhichisbetter

-- 
Andrew
pgp 0x31B0974B
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/

References:
- Re: BetterPrivacy - necessary?
  - From: Matthew

Prev by Author: TBB in a sandbox (osx)
Next by Author: Re: AdvTor
Previous by thread: Re: BetterPrivacy - necessary?
Next by thread: beneficia versus maleficia
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread