[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

[apb@cequrux.com: Re: [jwales@wikia.com: Re: [roy@rant-central.com: Re: [arma@mit.edu: Re: Wikipedia & Tor]]]]



----- Forwarded message from Alan Barrett <apb@xxxxxxxxxxx> -----

From: Alan Barrett <apb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:53:20 +0200
To: cypherpunks@xxxxxxxx
Cc: jwales@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [jwales@xxxxxxxxx: Re: [roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: Re:
  [arma@xxxxxxx: Re: Wikipedia & Tor]]]

> ----- Forwarded message from Jimmy Wales <jwales@xxxxxxxxx> -----
> We are not looking for a perfect solution.  Yes, Wikis will be
> vandalized.  We're prepared to deal with that, we do deal with that.
> But what I am seeking is some efforts to think usefully about how to
> helpfully reconcile our dual goals of openness and privacy.

Wikipedia should allow Tor users to register Wikipedia nyms.
Then they could block:
     Tor users trying to edit without a nym;
     Tor users trying to edit with a nym that has a bad reputation;
and they could rate-limit
     Tor users trying to edit with a nym that has insufficient history
     to be classified as good or bad;
while not blocking
     Tor users trying to edit with a nym that has a good reputation.

This will require some changes to the MediaWiki software that Wikipedia
uses.  AFAIK, there's currently no way to rate-limit nyms that have
insufficient history, and blocks on IP addresses are currently all or
nothing.

--apb (Alan Barrett)

----- End forwarded message -----
-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a>
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820            http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature