[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: ExitPolicy questions

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: ExitPolicy questions
From: Peter Palfrader <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 04:58:20 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 22:58:28 -0400
In-reply-to: <200709042343.l84Nh26L004765@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <200709042343.l84Nh26L004765@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Tue, 04 Sep 2007, Scott Bennett wrote:

> 	2) "ExitPolicyRejectPrivate 1" rejects 127.0.0.0/8, among others.  Why
> 	doesn't it then also reject 14.0.0.0/8, which is the alternate set of
> 	"localhost" addresses?

Because 14/8 is not an 'alternate set of "localhost" addresses'.

| Addresses within this block are assigned to users and should be treated as such.
says rfc3330.

Peter
-- 
                           |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
      Peter Palfrader      | : :' :      The  universal
 http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `'      Operating System
                           |   `-    http://www.debian.org/

References:
- ExitPolicy questions
  - From: Scott Bennett

Prev by Author: Re: New Tor routers in specific countries
Next by Author: Re: Filtering traffic from your node - for exit points
Previous by thread: Re: ExitPolicy questions
Next by thread: Re: ExitPolicy questions
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread