[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: end-to-end encryption question

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: end-to-end encryption question
From: M <maillist@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:59:27 +0300
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 05:59:43 -0400
In-reply-to: <20070913094633.GE23321@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200709130756.l8D7uf3d008671@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070913094633.GE23321@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Icedove 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070730)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>>      For obvious reasons, tor should not be getting directory information over
>> a connection that is not encrypted from end to end, even if everyone knows
>> exactly what the content of the directory information happens to be at any
>> given moment.
> 
> What are those reasons?  I'm sorry they are not apparent to me.
> 

ISP could mangle it for example.

M
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG6Qn/6fSN8IKlpYoRAoBHAJ9lLzT/RLhBfFgNLjKtenRc+mf9/QCdG9mW
yessR6m+tHislR1EQ+YKDUw=
=IErD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: end-to-end encryption question
  - From: Peter Palfrader

References:
- end-to-end encryption question
  - From: Scott Bennett
- Re: end-to-end encryption question
  - From: Peter Palfrader

Prev by Author: Re: Service: Bacula-dir Port: 9101 ?
Next by Author: Re: What do you think about this exit policy for germany?
Previous by thread: Re: end-to-end encryption question
Next by thread: Re: end-to-end encryption question
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread