Re: [tor-talk] wake up tor devs

[Juan <juan.g71@xxxxxxxxx>]

> > The real question is: with Freenet, I2P, Gnunet, CJDNS,
> > Phantom, Tor, etc... afaik all seemingly 'pretty good' and not
> > broken... *why* are their adoption shares ranked however
> > they are?
> 
> I think it's because they're all either abandoned, noticeably
> insecure, or in their infancy. Tor is the only one with an active
> developer community, a strong basis in research, and a proven track
> record of security.
> 
> Sometimes questions just have simple answers.


	So freenet is 'abandoned'? 'noticeably insecure'? or in 'its
	infancy'?

	I eagerly await some serious information here. 

	Plus your idea that tor works because allegedly there
	are no NSA documents saying otherwise is a joke. 

	"Absence of Evidence is not Evidence of Absence"









-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk