Re: New directions with much less objectives (Was Re: Comments?)

[Christian Reiniger <warewolf@mayn.de>]

Adrian Ratnapala wrote:

>> >I thought of switching to auto_ptr<>, since that kind of thing
>> >is more to my taste, but I balked because I am not sure if the
>> >auto_ptr<> on GNU systems is standard, so for now I am doing
>> 
>> Last time I checked (egcs 1.0.3) it wasn't :-((
>
>Can we rely on the behaviour documented is Soustroup?
>(Or however you spell it).

Stroustrup.

auto_ptr <> is completely missing from libstdc++. IIRC they left it out
because the behavior changed too much in the C++ draftes, and now it's
scheduled for libstdc++ 3 :(

Cu
	Christian
--

if (1==1.003) printf ("Pentium detected!\n");