[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The Kernel

To: john@dhh.gt.org
Subject: Re: The Kernel
From: George Bonser <grep@oriole.sbay.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 19:05:03 -0800 (PST)
cc: seul-dev-distrib@seul.org
In-Reply-To: <87g1mg81l8.fsfjgh@dhh.gt.org>
Sender: owner-seul-dev-distrib@seul.org

On 22 Jan 1998 john@dhh.gt.org wrote:

> Rick Jones writes:
> > That's perfectly acceptable as long as any differences between Debian and
> > FHS are made to conform to FHS and not Debian.
> 
> FHS will become Debian policy shortly after 2.0 comes out.  After that any
> differences between Debian and FHS will be bugs in Debian.

Right.  Consider FHS as a rough structure and Debian Policy as a detailed
guide within it.

George Bonser 
If NT is the answer, you didn't understand the question. (NOTE: Stolen sig)
http://www.debian.org
Debian/GNU Linux ... the maintainable operating system.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Kernel
  - From: Rick Jones <rickya@siservices.net>

References:
- Re: The Kernel
  - From: john@dhh.gt.org

Prev by Date: initrd boot
Next by Date: Re: The Kernel
Prev by thread: Re: The Kernel
Next by thread: Re: The Kernel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread