[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #2763 [Metrics]: Do we collect descriptors that don't get into the consensus?

#2763: Do we collect descriptors that don't get into the consensus?
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  arma     |          Owner:  karsten 
     Type:  task     |         Status:  assigned
 Priority:  normal   |      Milestone:          
Component:  Metrics  |        Version:          
 Keywords:           |         Parent:          
   Points:           |   Actualpoints:          
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------

Comment(by arma):

 I haven't thought about it for very long, but I wouldn't object to a
 /tor/server/complete or something that includes now-unused or never-
 actually-used descriptors that the authority has lying around.

 I also wouldn't object to a Tor patch that writes rejected descriptors to
 a file somewhere. We'd want to come up with some mechanism for making sure
 the file doesn't grow to infinity.

 (Does this mean this is now a 'Tor directory authority' task?)

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/2763#comment:9>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs