[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #29710 [Core Tor/sbws]: Is it acceptable that SBWS consistently reports 6200 relays, 1000 fewer than Torflow's 7200 universe?

#29710: Is it acceptable that SBWS consistently reports 6200 relays, 1000 fewer
than Torflow's 7200 universe?
---------------------------+-----------------------------------
 Reporter:  starlight      |          Owner:  (none)
     Type:  defect         |         Status:  needs_information
 Priority:  Medium         |      Milestone:
Component:  Core Tor/sbws  |        Version:  sbws: unspecified
 Severity:  Normal         |     Resolution:
 Keywords:                 |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:                 |         Points:
 Reviewer:                 |        Sponsor:
---------------------------+-----------------------------------
Changes (by teor):

 * status:  new => needs_information
 * milestone:  sbws: unspecified =>


Comment:

 Hi, we deployed sbws 1.1.0 to bastet and longclaw.
 sbws 1.1.0 fixes some bugs, and adds extra error reporting to the
 bandwidth file.
 (It generates file format version 1.4.0.)

 Can you please re-do your analysis with the latest votes and bandwidth
 files from longclaw?

 The bandwidth file for longclaw is available at:
 http://199.58.81.140/tor/status-vote/next/bandwidth

 sbws now reports all of the relays in the bandwidth file.
 Some relays will be excluded from the vote, their bandwidth lines contain
 "vote=0".
 https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/bandwidth-file-
 spec.txt#n886

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/29710#comment:8>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online

_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs