[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #19960 [Core Tor/Tor]: Tor v0.2.9.1-alpha-dev (git-b3f43a22ab921ce6) - failing options/validate__transproxy test on NetBSD
#19960: Tor v0.2.9.1-alpha-dev (git-b3f43a22ab921ce6) - failing
options/validate__transproxy test on NetBSD
-----------------------------------------+---------------------------------
Reporter: yancm | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: Medium | Milestone: Tor:
| 0.2.9.x-final
Component: Core Tor/Tor | Version: Tor:
| 0.2.9.1-alpha
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: self test regression netbsd | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
-----------------------------------------+---------------------------------
Comment (by nickm):
In e7ade23f9723f55a504ebd8279cbadf0aca108c6 I increased the verborsity of
the output of the test, and now on the buildbot I see:
{{{
FAIL src/test/test_options.c:1089: Expected NULL but got 'ipfw is a
FreeBSD-specificand OS X/Darwin-specific feature.'
}}}
a) "specificand" is a typo.
b) Does netbsd support ipfw or not? We imply "yes" in test_options.c, but
"no" in our definition of KERNEL_MAY_SUPPORT_IPFW. Which of these is
correct?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/19960#comment:15>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs