[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #22637 [Webpages/Website]: Find a more maintainable approach for the signing-keys page
#22637: Find a more maintainable approach for the signing-keys page
------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: arma | Owner: hiro
Type: defect | Status: accepted
Priority: Medium | Milestone: website
| redesign
Component: Webpages/Website | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: website-content, website-bug | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
Comment (by boklm):
Replying to [comment:1 cypherpunks]:
> I would like to see key revocations explained.
>
> For example, `05FA 4425 3F6C 19A8 B7F5 18D4 2D00 0988 5898 39A3`,
revoked subkey of `Tor Browser Developers`.
You can find the corresponding bug number in the git log: #16898. We
usually use sub-keys for around 2 years before switching to a new one. I
think this one had to be revoked because it didn't have an expiration
date.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/22637#comment:6>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs