Re: [tor-bugs] #12023 [Tor]: Should we update timestamp_last_added_nonpadding when we send a destroy cell?

["Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki" <blackhole@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

#12023: Should we update timestamp_last_added_nonpadding when we send a destroy
cell?
------------------------+--------------------------------
     Reporter:  nickm   |      Owner:
         Type:  defect  |     Status:  new
     Priority:  normal  |  Milestone:  Tor: 0.2.5.x-final
    Component:  Tor     |    Version:
   Resolution:          |   Keywords:  tor-client
Actual Points:          |  Parent ID:
       Points:          |
------------------------+--------------------------------

Comment (by nickm):

 In that case we should probably rethink the #6977 fix, since a late
 destroy from the client will often kill the circuit anyway.  (Since the
 connection will be canonical on the client's side but non-canonical on the
 relay's side, the relay will often be past its idle timeout when the
 client kills the last circuit.)

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/12023#comment:4>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs