Re: [tor-bugs] #27690 [Core Tor/Tor]: Update bandwidth-file-spec with scaling methods

["Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki" <blackhole@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

#27690: Update bandwidth-file-spec with scaling methods
----------------------------------+-------------------------------------
 Reporter:  juga                  |          Owner:  (none)
     Type:  defect                |         Status:  new
 Priority:  Medium                |      Milestone:  sbws 1.0 (MVP must)
Component:  Core Tor/Tor          |        Version:
 Severity:  Normal                |     Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-spec, tor-bwauth  |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:  #27107                |         Points:
 Reviewer:                        |        Sponsor:
----------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by teor):

 Replying to [comment:1 juga]:
 > Maybe we should not include any scaling method, and instead create a
 bandwidth scaling specification when we come out with an algorithm that is
 tested enough we are happy with.

 We should delete the parts of the spec that we aren't going to implement
 soon.

 > Otherwise, should we include/repeat Torflow scaling in this spec?

 Yes, because eventually we will delete the torflow repository and spec.
 Also, torflow's scaling spec is hard to find, and it is buried in a whole
 lot of other specs for code that is not used.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/27690#comment:2>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online

_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs