[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: mirror down

To: tor-mirrors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: mirror down
From: Michael Kohl <citizen428@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 23:53:00 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: tor-mirrors-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: tor-mirrors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 17:53:07 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Pgod8sPx6xCHAwEJHumDQV+kfwbv6Lb3FfCUXxGYS2M=; b=D1CQJ+sTQI7qkyqiRAPYih2Sb5KtVkgXya5uM7wkXErmk1anfuMv+68QtXn2tsLaa4 NYDm2ECeuL8zM+ulKHTJfQc4guXuuz9rmhvw0bnO50R4CHNHaYd2mBfHTZ8geJ4b9yaZ 2/e1ytII32j/FfrCXug7YYzYf21gIS7X7oJT4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=QCgmQPgWudnyGUuEtkjhwALNqToADxeazayux5AfXePCLxNRGsVNST2qm7yuZ0QYMJ TnfqEdOD0dxmkmbZg8pF5/TDEqR1myVYA88KoaPqOBYXeK1l1El++TRzP5E8VqM/10yJ SegmcoNIjvEXLUW5d+HDWZUzLU7fncLxN/eIE=
In-reply-to: <4C9A778D.20606@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4C979025.8020403@xxxxxxxx> <AANLkTimMtDkkzRPnv_8sQzw0CA8x7SdsNkXoztDJJCZC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C97A1B6.50409@xxxxxxxx> <4C9A778D.20606@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-mirrors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-tor-mirrors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Evert Meulie <evert@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is it not? If the authorities are indeed cracking down on tor-mirrors,

I got an off-list response, it was not directed against the Tor mirror per se.

Michael

References:
- mirror down
  - From: doc.kuehn
- Re: mirror down
  - From: Michael Kohl
- Re: mirror down
  - From: doc.kuehn
- Re: mirror down
  - From: Evert Meulie

Prev by Author: Re: Mirror status
Next by Author: Remove
Previous by thread: Re: mirror down
Next by thread: Remove
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread