[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Mystery of bridge utilization



More private pool? Meaning which pool exactly?

(I'm expecting something in the lines of "I could tell you but I'd have to kill you")

On Apr 2, 2012 10:31 AM, "Runa A. Sandvik" <runa.sandvik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Steve Snyder <swsnyder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've got 2 bridges, with 1 IP address in each of 2 servers in the same geographical area. ÂThe IP addresses are not consecutive.
>
> Both servers have the same hardware and software configurations. ÂBoth were established in mid-January and (excepting a few brief periods of down time) have been running since then.
>
> So why then in March did one server handle 200GB of traffic while the other handled only 2GB? Â(Yes, a x100 difference.)

Sounds like one bridge ended up in the https or email pool (meaning we
give the bridge address out via bridges.torproject.org or
bridges@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx), while the other ended up in a more private
pool.

> Also: is there something I can do to make my under-utilized bridge more attractive to the Bridge Authorities?

You could set it up as a relay instead?

--
Runa A. Sandvik
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays