[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Rejecting 380 vulnerable guard/exit keys

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Rejecting 380 vulnerable guard/exit keys
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:07:55 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:08:07 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=cpPNo1C8ffG+R6qfYUQbPdQ8m2AX7wC9PhT6thkxyCw=; b=nByHFTdvrW2LiODPujBCyYGYgWMtPIzKYl0PQPUWy8qyNGL8zMlbidgI7ydO3tWspx D3sX/lYVRxnlsiTUFs43ihF4ozU7YO7syogo1UsC6vSMjFUVt0gNAXUCd6ye/Iuid2tG OtwA5ioelaq2kNeSX9GDIyk4Uq4axIpf+Im5qTy0KqnrVesJ1dcPn4rI+ImlbXq5xK8E ZkUGLpc1HqwfaztpDFATkBJq30iGUKuQG397ogDvCwaQIjon4sveEIa5DdIMU+jEqXRo 2zoDeMmhid6kCVeFmLTgf+drsUBExZeQHYSXgUGQAQZRErDtibVvYblP1I2eIEL8UPCU TSOA==
In-reply-to: <20140416044254.GR6713@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20140416044254.GR6713@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Updating a previous post full of measurement caveats (in particular
not keying IP/FP to discard old descriptors)... now at:
- 35% reduction in cumulative relay uptime from 14.1Gsec pre-hb.
- 4400 out of 5835 descriptors with uptime less than hb-release
and totaling 1.2Gsec among them.
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

References:
- [tor-relays] Rejecting 380 vulnerable guard/exit keys
  - From: Roger Dingledine

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Atlas Entry
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Grouping cloud relays running within same provider
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Rejecting 380 vulnerable guard/exit keys
Next by thread: [tor-relays] Rejecting 380 vulnerable guard/exit keys
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread