> On 6 Aug 2017, at 09:20, Ralph Seichter <tor-relays-ml@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 06.08.17 00:41, Chad MILLER wrote: > >> We have several supported lines. Simple greater-than doesn't tell us >> anything about later-ness. > > That's common when developing on multiple branches. In any case, I did > not say that greater-than is relevant, only newer-than on a production > branch, but even that is not crucial. My main point is that I find it > surprising that the list of recommended Tor versions is not centrally > maintained and distributed automatically once a new production release > is made available to the public. This would be a single point of failure (and possibly compromise). We try to avoid those by having people involved in the updates. T -- Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n xmpp: teor at torproject dot org ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays