[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: not much throughput

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: not much throughput
From: cmeclax-sazri <cmeclax-sazri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 18:16:05 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: tor-relays-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 20:47:09 -0500
In-reply-to: <20101231225940.GX3255@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <201012311600.29780.cmeclax-sazri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101231225940.GX3255@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405)

On Friday 31 December 2010 17:59:40 Roger Dingledine wrote:
> What's the nickname of the relay?
>
> --Roger

http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.php?FP=04f0ee7e3fcb6f19d5031498af3c9d28023762c4

cmeclax

Follow-Ups:
- Re: not much throughput
  - From: Roger Dingledine

References:
- not much throughput
  - From: cmeclax-sazri
- Re: not much throughput
  - From: Roger Dingledine

Prev by Author: not much throughput
Next by Author: Arm Release 1.4.0
Previous by thread: Re: not much throughput
Next by thread: Re: not much throughput
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread