On 12/04/16 13:39, Ralph Seichter wrote: > On 04.12.16 17:54, Rana wrote: > >> In short, if Tor Project does not want relays with dynamic IP, it >> should say so and I would stop wasting my time. > > What's with the entitlement issues? You are free to contribute to the > Tor project, but if you don't have the programming skills or the wish > to do so, at least don't complain about other peoples' work in such a > hostile manner. Nobody here owes you anything. > Woah. I think this discussion got a little out-of-hand quickly. Rana's point about the desirability of dynamic IPs is certainly of-interest to a wide array of people. Raising it is a worthwhile question or contribution in my humble opinion. The point is worth a discussion and feedback. Not everyone running a relay should be technically required to submit a diff when raising a point. There are certainly software projects that are quick to reply with that.... (ahem). A more productive direction might be pointing point https://trac.torproject.org/. It's worth noting that replying to what is likely a common thought among a lot of relay operators, you are not only replying to Rana, but to hosts of people who stumble upon this thread from the archives. g -- 5F77 765E 40D6 5340 A0F5 3401 4997 FF11 A86F 44E2
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays