[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Consensus Weight low when compared to Advertised Bandwidth



Also you didn't migrate your fingerprint. So it's a new server and will take weeks if not months for the consensus weight to creep up.


--
Matt Westfall
President & CIO
ECAN Solutions, Inc.
804.592.1672

On December 16, 2019 1:30:48 PM EST, Neel Chauhan <neel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

After having my Primcast.com dedicated server suspended, I signed up for
a dedicated server from Psychz Networks in their Dallas location to run
a FreeBSD-powered Tor exit relay.

https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/9B6672E247BC4656915DF03A470D4B5BC2E7601F

While Psychz is a bit more expensive than Primcast/ServerRoom (and that
is with an special offer), I get a slightly faster server and far better
customer support.

One problem is that the consensus weight value is rather low in
proportion to the advertised bandwidth value, when they should be
approximately similar.

In fact, my server's CPU usage never goes beyond 1%.

Is this normal now that sbws is being deployed? Or is it bad peering on
my relay?

-Neel
https://www.neelc.org/
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays