On Thursday, December 9, 2021 3:11:25 PM CET John Ricketts wrote: > That's what I was thinking... I run 100 exit nodes. I'd like to get more > opinions. > > -----Original Message----- > From: tor-relays <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of > Felix Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 8:04 AM > To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Responding to Tor censorship in Russia > > > > Since all of my exit nodes are within the same /16 - would I have to > > run bridges on newly acquired IPv4 space?-- > > A bridge has no `family´. An entity running bridge and exit generates an Unfortunately this is a bad design flaw. :-( > end-to-end situation and might not be what we want. An entity that wants to exploit the end-to-end situation just does it under fake names. Well-known and proven operators cannot help the Tor project. We actually want to do the same thing as John. Known exit operators who want to set up several 100 bridges. -- ╰_╯ Ciao Marco! Debian GNU/Linux It's free software and it gives you freedom!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays