Re: [tor-relays] Irony and inconsistency

[Fabiano London <franciscolondon33@xxxxxxxxx>]

Please! I am not participate in this forum anymore! Any e mail that coming after this will be reported to Uk intelligence police (M15) 

Be aware pls with all posts or e mails here !

Have a nice weekend to all  

On 12 Jan 2014, at 18:30, Richard Budd <rotorbudd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Same thing here.

I had a server from day one with them and was told "Sorry you've been with us from the start.

But after careful consideration, Crissic Solutions LLC has decided to ban the usage of TOR on the Crissic network."

On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Steve Snyder <swsnyder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 01/03/2014 05:46 PM, I wrote:

In this morning's messages -

One about three relays paid for a year in advance.

âSomething Solutions LLC has decided to ban the usage of TOR.â despite âWe DO Allow Tor Relays"  being in their current AUP.

[snip]

I see no need to be so solicitous of the vendor's reputation.  It is Crissic Solutions ( http://crissic.net/ ) that has changed its policy.

When I asked the reason for the policy change I was told "Few different reasons, primarily network related."  My take is that they didn't like their users actually using all the bandwidth that they paid for.
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxorg
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays