[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

[tor-relays] Would be good if Tor were more multithreaded.



Hi,

Did you consider the numCPUs option ?
--
Mit freundlichen Grüssen / Sincerely yours

Sebastian Urbach

----------------------------------------------
Those who would give up essential Liberty,
to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve
neither Liberty nor Safety.
----------------------------------------------
Benjamin Franklin (1706 - 1790),  Inventor,
journalist, printer, diplomat, and statesman



Here's where top hangs out on Libero. Seems it would be a better situation if Tor would actually use the second core.

top - 12:05:07 up 5 days, 21:35,  1 user,  load average: 0.33, 0.43, 0.34
Tasks: 130 total,   2 running, 128 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
Cpu0  : 47.2%us, 21.0%sy,  0.0%ni, 17.6%id,  0.0%wa,  0.0%hi, 13.8%si,  0.3%st
Cpu1  :  0.0%us,  0.3%sy,  0.0%ni, 99.7%id,  0.0%wa,  0.0%hi,  0.0%si,  0.0%st
Mem:   1914136k total,   718704k used,  1195432k free,   139588k buffers
Swap:  3981304k total,        0k used,  3981304k free,   116320k cached

 PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
1340 _tor      20   0  566m 224m  36m R 71.7 12.0   6168:37 tor
9887 nobody    20   0 21644  13m  892 S  7.3  0.7   0:31.85 scamper
9889 root      20   0  102m  916  772 S  0.7  0.0   0:02.80 sed
9921 root      20   0 15028 1312  992 R  0.3  0.1   0:00.19 top
   1 root      20   0 19232 1480 1212 S  0.0  0.1   0:00.27 init
   2 root      20   0     0    0    0 S  0.0  0.0   0:00.00 kthreadd




_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays