I'm currently trying to build a network on Brazil. The main problem is to get a fast network link. Telecoms brought out shitty infrastructure and high "combo deal prices". But I hope that bringing up more nodes should attenuate the issue. At least for web browsing. -- Luther Blisset GNUPG/PGP KEY: 6722CF80 I challenge you to play the game in which there is no loser but everything is fun and worthwhile!
--- Begin Message ---
- To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Sitevalley is no longer Tor-friendly
- From: mick <mbm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:51:44 +0100
- Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx designates 2620:0:6b0:b:1a1a:0:26e5:480d as permitted sender) smtp.mail=tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: andrenbatista@xxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <CA+cU71n55f039e4A61QCkNuUNMYmvGQX+NCzW8ZfHiVxjstjHA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
- List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
- List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
- List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <CA+cU71n55f039e4A61QCkNuUNMYmvGQX+NCzW8ZfHiVxjstjHA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:49:46 -0400 Tom Ritter <tom@xxxxxxxxx> allegedly wrote: > Sending this out, as I suspect I am not the only person running a node > on SiteValley, as they have pretty good bandwidth for pretty cheap. > > I had inquired in the beginning if they allowed Tor, and they said > yes, but if we get too many abuse complaints we'll shut it down. So > maybe 4 or 5 abuse complaints later they did indeed give me the > ultimatum to shut it down or get shut down. So I made them give me a > new IP address, and made it into a middle node. (The new IP was > because I was thinking of making it a bridge.) Hmm. Pretty crummy AUP. And /very/ crummy treatment of a customer. I wonder if we are going to see more of this sort of thing now. I think the tor network needs greater geographic diversity. Mick --------------------------------------------------------------------- Mick Morgan gpg fingerprint: FC23 3338 F664 5E66 876B 72C0 0A1F E60B 5BAD D312 http://baldric.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
--- End Message ---
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays