Re: [tor-relays] BWauth no-consensus state in effect

[starlight.2015q2@xxxxxxxxxxx]

Welcome.

This event led to my discovering the
Unmeasured=1 flag in the cached-*consensus
files (was wondering where it was).

That new BWauth is badly needed.  See
about 460 unmeasured relays and from
an unscientific sample it seems
like many of them are stuck-at-20
exit nodes--valuable resources
that should be utilized.


At 15:17 7/30/2015 -0500, you wrote:
>On 30 July 2015 at 12:14, Tom Ritter <tom@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Thanks for the heads up!
>>
>> A fifth bwauth is expected to start
>> voting "real soon now", and I'm
>> not sure why maatuska didn't vote
>> on bwauth data last vote, but I've
>> pinged some folks so hopefully we
>> can get this resolved quickly.
>
>Aaaand we're back! =)  Sorry for the outage.
>
>Bandwidth scanner status
>
>maatuska 6890 Measured values in w lines
>gabelmoo 6444 Measured values in w lines
>moria1      6754 Measured values in w lines
>
>-tom

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays