Roger Dingledine: > And speaking of > community-building, are there volunteers lined up who would contact > bridge operators if given the chance, or is this more of a theoretical > "maybe it would happen"? I'll eventually add a check for "is exit operator also a bridge operator?" and might contact operators in such cases (I'm not saying this is 'communicty-building'). > Thought 4: In retrospect, it would be good to have some initial analysis > of the (currently secret) data set. For example, how many bridges set > contactinfo, and how many don't? How many of each of those are 'fast' > (popular) bridges? What fraction of the contactinfos are actually a > usable email address? How many bridge families are there now, i.e. > bridges that use the same contact email address? Maybe most bridges > don't set it currently, so this whole question doesn't matter much, or > maybe many of them set it but obfuscate it, which will make your > notification plan harder than you predicted. I really like T4. thanks for your thoughts! -- https://mastodon.social/@nusenu twitter: @nusenu_
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays