Thus spake Moritz Bartl (moritz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > After we got Softlayer to at least add a comment to our IP range, > surprisingly most complaints went to us directly. So far, with the > limited exit policy, Softlayer hasn't been bothered about us. It is a > controversial topic if and why one should willingly limit the exit > policy, but I don't feel too bad about the current set of allowed ports > with our nodes. After all, we at Torservers don't want to help file > sharers, and I feel HTTP(S)/XMPP traffic is more important than traffic > on arbitrary ports. Just as a heads up, I went through /etc/services as well as a few wikipedia pages of ports listings and updated the port list to include a lot of new ports about two months back (most notable are svn, git, and mercurial): https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tips-running-exit-node-minimal-harassment -- Mike Perry Mad Computer Scientist fscked.org evil labs
Attachment:
pgpAVN5niI4YJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature