On Fri, 08 Nov 2013 20:15:51 +0100 elrippo <elrippo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> allegedly wrote: > Jope. I tend to have some issues with some CA's. > But yes you are right, i should get me a decent certificate. > I will do that, promise. > > You self signed your site certificate...? > > > I don't see any problem per se with a self-signed certificate on a site which does not purport to protect anything sensitive (such as financial transactions). The problem with this particular certificate is that the common name identifier is both wrong (www) and badly formattted (http://) But both of those errors can be corrected very quickly. Why pay a CA if you don't trust the CA model? Mick --------------------------------------------------------------------- Mick Morgan gpg fingerprint: FC23 3338 F664 5E66 876B 72C0 0A1F E60B 5BAD D312 http://baldric.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays