[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] new (?) : Average packaged cell fullness: 96.772%. TLS write overhead: 96%

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] new (?) : Average packaged cell fullness: 96.772%. TLS write overhead: 96%
From: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 10:29:01 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 04:29:17 -0500
In-reply-to: <59697B56-11D1-4FF3-9972-4A68E70A6BC2@gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <dd09b096-45a1-e5ea-08c4-2fc5d4a441c0@gmx.de> <59697B56-11D1-4FF3-9972-4A68E70A6BC2@gmail.com>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.0

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 11/27/2016 10:16 AM, teor wrote:
> Perhaps your relay sent a lot of very small packets?
> (Interactive protocols like chat and SSH could be responsible.)

Hhm,

it is a very fresh exit (setup yesterday evening) - so that might be the reason.

(My server crashed yesterday w/o any known reason and was down for an hour. I decided to kick off the old data directory and use the chance to use an ext4 fs encrypted data directory)

- -- 
Toralf
PGP: C4EACDDE 0076E94E
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHYEAREIAB4FAlg6p10XHHRvcmFsZi5mb2Vyc3RlckBnbXguZGUACgkQxOrN3gB2
6U4XGQD8DSimluYQv+fL/IvOt+zcKRVuF2XPMDahGgImwsz9yaEA/0sHLZh8mf/H
+FuEDaPYmbDP5y2KvEphQbvkP0Nqoev+
=2GZb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

References:
- [tor-relays] new (?) : Average packaged cell fullness: 96.772%. TLS write overhead: 96%
  - From: Toralf Förster
- Re: [tor-relays] new (?) : Average packaged cell fullness: 96.772%. TLS write overhead: 96%
  - From: teor

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] DoS from my tor guard VPS
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] assign_to_cpuworker failed. Ignoring.
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] new (?) : Average packaged cell fullness: 96.772%. TLS write overhead: 96%
Next by thread: [tor-relays] Assigning new IP adrees to current relay
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread