OK further bad news, Exit shut down by DO yesterday. Here the latest statement from them: "Additionally, we are not allowing further TOR exit nodes on our infrastructure - they generate a large amount of abuse, are used for various illegal activities, and attract a large number of DDoS attacks. You're more than welcome to run bridges, obfs proxies, and relays, but running an exit node is at your own risk, and sufficient abuse may result in suspension of service." Am 08.10.2016 um 05:00 schrieb Alecks Gates: > I'm running on DO as well with the reduced exit policy and have had > about five complaints in 2 months. DO certainly appears to be getting > less and less happy. I'm glad to know it's not just me, though. > > Hopefully a curated list of IPs to reject will help a lot. Thanks for > the link to tornull. > > Exit Node fingerprints: > E553AC1CA05365EA218D477C2FF4C48986919D07 > 889550CB9C98CF172CB977AA942B77E9759056C2 > > Alecks > > On 10/07/2016 07:04 PM, Matthew Finkel wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 12:16:39AM +0200, Markus Koch wrote: >>> 2016-10-08 0:09 GMT+02:00 Tristan <supersluether@xxxxxxxxx>: >>>> This page has 3 policies: Reduce exit policy, reduced-reduced exit policy, >>>> and a lightweight example policy. >>>> >>>> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy >>>> >>>> >>>> On Oct 7, 2016 5:01 PM, "Markus Koch" <niftybunny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> reduced-reduced exit policy. ? >>>>> >>>>> Illuminate me, pls. >>>>> >>> Thank you both! >>> >>> Will try https://tornull.org. Perhaps it helps. >>> >>> Markus
Attachment:
0xC8C330E7.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays