> On 30 Oct 2017, at 10:21, Igor Mitrofanov <igor.n.mitrofanov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It looks like 94.7% of all Running relays have the "Fast" flag now. If
> that percentage becomes 100%, the flag will become meaningless.
> What were the reasons behind the current definition of "Fast", and are
> those still valid? If not, should "Fast" become self-adjusting
> ("faster than 2 Mbps or 70% of all Guard relays, whichever is
> greater")?
It is self-adjusting, and we expect at least 87.5% of relays to have it:
"Fast" -- A router is 'Fast' if it is active, and its bandwidth is either in
the top 7/8ths for known active routers or at least 100KB/s.
https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/dir-spec.txt#n2408
But maybe we could increase the threshold.
Feel free to open the ticket at:
https://trac.torproject.org/
--
Tim / teor
PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays