Re: [tor-relays] onionoo

[Karsten Loesing <karsten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 9/3/13 5:59 AM, eliaz wrote:
> On 9/2/2013 11:59 AM, Steve Snyder wrote:
>> On 09/02/2013 10:02 AM, Kostas Jakeliunas wrote:
>>> [1]: http://globe.rndm.de/
>>
>> Having this tool on an unencrypted HTTP site doesn't seem safe to me.
>> Anybody can sniff the bridge IP addresses that users submit for reporting.
> 
> It may be different if someone compiles the program locally, but AFAICT
> no secrets are being divulged from the globe web page.  From the page
> the details of no bridge can be found without knowing the name of the
> bridge in the first place; and if someone knows that she also know the
> other details. One doesn't have to go to the page to do a brute force
> attack.

Agreed, Globe doesn't divulge any secrets, mostly because Onionoo
doesn't contain any secrets.  All bridge data that Onionoo has is
sanitized and doesn't contain sensitive information anymore.

> At the same time globe is useful in helping lower-level bridge operators
> such as myself get a better sense of what the information windows in the
> browser bundle are actually telling us.

I agree.

> If I'm wrong in any of the above, please do correct me.

No need to.  Thanks for running a bridge!

Best,
Karsten

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays