On Sep 5, 2013, at 20:13 , Kevin C. Krinke wrote: > > Machine's performance and resource usage are all within allowed norms (in fact running better than the 2.3.x release). I concur with Kevin that this built is running smoothly: Sep 05 21:24:37.000 [notice] Circuit handshake stats since last time: 2138926/4064871 TAP, 22/22 NTor. Sep 05 22:24:37.000 [notice] Circuit handshake stats since last time: 1688832/2282251 TAP, 605/605 NTor. Cpu 16%, load 1.77, using 565 MB RAM. Average 5-6 MiB/s. // Yoriz On Sep 5, 2013, at 20:13 , Kevin C. Krinke wrote: > Just a quick note on my exit node's stats: > > 17:46:33 [NOTICE] Circuit handshake stats since last time: 25849/25857 TAP, 117/117 NTor. > 16:46:33 [NOTICE] Circuit handshake stats since last time: 7809/7810 TAP, 65/65 NTor. > > That's one heck of a climb on the TAP side. Machine's performance and resource usage are all within allowed norms (in fact running better than the 2.3.x release). > > Consistently running bandwidth in the 3-4 Mb/sec range both up and down. > > If anyone wants to externally monitor via whatever existing means; my node's ID is: OneTorST8 and fingerprint ID: EE9D7103D6013885BBF767D3B4F51CD0B9E59976 running version 2.4.17-rc-dev. > > > -- > Kevin C. Krinke <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> > 851662D2 - 5216953E0CBA1767D6064AB2DAC1902A > http://kevin.c.krinke.ca/851662D2.asc > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays