[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Strange difference between rx and tx traffic



Yes I know Tristan -Thank you for reminding (a quick good tutorial would make change easier)

Unfortunately it doesn’t give an answer on the question.

Am 27.09.2016 um 16:23 schrieb Tristan:
> Just so you know, you should be using a local DNS server, or one from the OpenNIC project, instead of Google DNS.  Google DNS sees almost 50% of all Tor traffic, and could potentially link people across exits.
> 
> 
> On Sep 27, 2016 8:48 AM, "pa011" <pa011@xxxxxx <mailto:pa011@xxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
>     On one of my recently started Exits I do see a rather huge and increasing difference between in and out traffic that I don see on any other Exit so far.
>     The rise doesn’t seem to be linear..
> 
>     Any explanation for that - or can it just be on the back of a not fixed repetitive warning?
> 
>     Sep 27 06:42:46.000 [warn] eventdns: All nameservers have failed
>     Sep 27 06:42:46.000 [notice] eventdns: Nameserver 8.8.8.8:53 <http://8.8.8.8:53> is back up
> 
>     Thanks
>     Paul
> 
> 
>      eth0  /  daily
> 
>              day         rx      |     tx      |    total    |   avg. rate
>          ------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------
>          11.09.2016   539,96 MiB |   88,50 MiB |  628,47 MiB |   59,59 kbit/s
>          12.09.2016     1,47 GiB |    1,06 GiB |    2,53 GiB |  245,60 kbit/s
>          13.09.2016    10,03 GiB |    9,86 GiB |   19,89 GiB |    1,93 Mbit/s
>          14.09.2016    17,35 GiB |   16,69 GiB |   34,04 GiB |    3,30 Mbit/s
>          15.09.2016    53,11 GiB |   51,59 GiB |  104,70 GiB |   10,17 Mbit/s
>          16.09.2016    99,08 GiB |   96,87 GiB |  195,96 GiB |   19,03 Mbit/s
>          17.09.2016   144,45 GiB |  140,66 GiB |  285,12 GiB |   27,68 Mbit/s
>          18.09.2016   190,05 GiB |  184,50 GiB |  374,55 GiB |   36,36 Mbit/s
>          19.09.2016   231,95 GiB |  223,90 GiB |  455,86 GiB |   44,26 Mbit/s
>          20.09.2016   291,30 GiB |  282,25 GiB |  573,55 GiB |   55,69 Mbit/s
>          21.09.2016   343,19 GiB |  332,33 GiB |  675,52 GiB |   65,59 Mbit/s
>          22.09.2016   347,57 GiB |  329,66 GiB |  677,22 GiB |   65,75 Mbit/s
>          23.09.2016   388,91 GiB |  373,21 GiB |  762,13 GiB |   74,00 Mbit/s
>          24.09.2016   381,35 GiB |  361,64 GiB |  742,99 GiB |   72,14 Mbit/s
>          25.09.2016   391,60 GiB |  364,34 GiB |  755,94 GiB |   73,39 Mbit/s
>          26.09.2016   374,59 GiB |  337,81 GiB |  712,40 GiB |   69,17 Mbit/s
>          27.09.2016   144,06 GiB |  131,67 GiB |  275,73 GiB |   70,89 Mbit/s
>          ------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------
>          estimated    382,03 GiB |  349,18 GiB |  731,21 GiB |
>     _______________________________________________
>     tor-relays mailing list
>     tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays