> On 24 Sep 2017, at 08:32, nusenu <nusenu-lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > [1] is not maintained since a long time. > I'm curious what the reason for assigning the badexit flag to [2] > was. If you know anything about it and can share something, that would > be great. A better email address for this question is bad-relays@ https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReportingBadRelays#MyrelayswasgiventheBadExitflag.Whatsup > [2] https://atlas.torproject.org/#search/flag:badexit > > 37.221.171.234 75FCEA0BE7A2A472669352A1F0F2E59F99C6A3AA > 37.221.171.237 128814837EC27F20D76EBDDB2CB3AB70258F0BA8 > > [1] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/badRelays T -- Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n xmpp: teor at torproject dot org ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays