[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: update


This was not what I meant. Iwas referring to how we would get the prompts
from the users and verify them against a database.

-----Original Message-----
From: david.buddrige@mitswa.com.au <david.buddrige@mitswa.com.au>
To: njd@rivuug.webfront.net.au <njd@rivuug.webfront.net.au>
Cc: computerbank-dev@rivuug.webfront.net.au
<computerbank-dev@rivuug.webfront.net.au>; computerbank@linux.org.au
Date: Tuesday, 23 February 1999 4:09
Subject: RE: update

>We could just have user-name / passwords... do you think we'd need to
>encrypt the transactions?  Are there any encryption librairies around that
>could be used?  SSLeay might / might not be useful here...
>David Buddrige
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nathan Dietsch [SMTP:njd@rivuug.webfront.net.au]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 1999 1:01 PM
>> To: Com puter Bank Database Development List
>> Subject: update
>> Hello all,
>> Sorry about being so slow in development, things are a bit full on at the
>> moment. I hope to allocate 1 hour a day for development of the database,
>> so it should move along nicely.
>> Does anyone have any ideas for authenticating users ?
>> Nathan