Trish Wrote
Wednesday, September 13, 2000 4:50 PM
For that
to work nationally, we might then need to make all the State
> offices who
wanted to use the Computerbank Australia name become
> branches of the Vic
Association, with all that implies of taking on and
> being faithful to
the CBV statement of purposes and constitution &c. > We
need heaps of
input before deciding whether this is a good way to
> go; let's hear the
views of all, eh?
Hi Trish
I think as the Foundation Branch and the
reason the other states have or are
looking at having
computerbanks.
Any branch being set up must be faithful to CBV statement
of purposes and
constitution. If they are not they are not a branch of CBV
but are different
org anisations.
Each state needed to quickly vote on
that!
I feel the having a National body is the way to go, as stated by
someone
else it would be good for corporate sponsors, media, and public
appeal, as
well as Government funding.
As far as the name goes, I think
you already have a problem with
Computerbank Pty Ltd, being taken if I
owned that, I would be putting up a
good case against you being
Computerbank Australia as you already have a
name and if the reason to change
is just because other states want to set
up. I would say that's why I became
a Company.
Maybe it should be looked at of finding a different
suitable name to cover
the whole of Australia if the states vote to be
part of your organisation.
So again I say to you people in Vic you are
the one who came up with the
idea, so if you decide to stay as CBV or change
to something else, we the
branches must decide if that is where we
belong and I for one think it is.
regards
KerryB
Kerry Bowden
O.A.M.
www.secretwomensbusiness.com.au