[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: More Soundtrack
On 08.03.2004 18:34, Dave Fancella wrote:
> On Monday 08 March 2004 05:42 pm, Jens Granseuer wrote:
> > > I found an appropriate license for it. :) This song is provided under
> > > the Open Source License v2, the complete text of which should be embedded
> > > in the midi file and can also be found here:
> > >
> > > http://opensource.org/licenses/osl-2.0.php
> > >
> > > I assume it's GPL compatible. If it's not, I'll find one that is. ;)
[...]
> Hm. Somewhere you suggested Creative Commons for the license. Maybe that was
> in a personal email. Anyway, here's my response to that. ;)
>
> I don't really care what license it's under, as long as it's essentially GPL
> for music, so if you guys have a preferred license for the music, no problem
> there. This isn't a deal-breaker in any sense of the word. I just want to
> make sure that people who have the music have the same rights the GPL would
> provide them if it was a program, that's all. I like the OSL, and I would
> prefer that, but the Creative Commons license isn't significantly different
> (unless a lawyer tells me so, I'm not one), so it's not that big a deal to
> me. :)
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html
lists the OSL as GPL-incompatible. They don't say what problems they have
with it, unfortunately, and the CC licenses aren't mentioned at all, but at
this time I'd propose to take one of those.
Jens