[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Thoughts on two-player campaigns

To: crimson-users@seul.org
Subject: Re: Thoughts on two-player campaigns
From: Jens Granseuer <jensgr@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 20:47:23 +0000
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: crimson-users-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: crimson-users@seul.org
Delivery-date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 16:49:12 -0400
In-reply-to: <200409011225.42090.davidfancella@davefancella.com> (fromdavidfancella@davefancella.com on Wed Sep 1 18:25:42 2004)
References: <200409011225.42090.davidfancella@davefancella.com>
Reply-to: crimson-users@seul.org
Sender: owner-crimson-users@seul.org

On 01.09.2004 18:25, Dave Fancella wrote:

I came up with two alternatives. One is to just rewrite the stories for each map (no unit changes, nothing) to accomodate who wins each map, a reasonable goal since it means you need twice as many mission briefings as you'd ordinarily need, and you already need twice as many mission briefings as maps, so 64 mission briefings for a campaign with a depth of 16 maps.

Even only rewriting the briefings seems like an insane amount of work to me

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Thoughts on two-player campaigns
  - From: Dave Fancella <davidfancella@davefancella.com>

References:
- Thoughts on two-player campaigns
  - From: Dave Fancella <davidfancella@davefancella.com>

Prev by Author: Mapping tutorial continued
Next by Author: Uprising - The map
Previous by thread: Thoughts on two-player campaigns
Next by thread: Re: Thoughts on two-player campaigns
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread