[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rep:Re: [f-cpu] F-CPU vs. Itanium

To: f-cpu@seul.org
Subject: Re: Rep:Re: [f-cpu] F-CPU vs. Itanium
From: Michael Riepe <michael@stud.uni-hannover.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 12:27:38 +0200
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: f-cpu-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-To: f-cpu@seul.org
Delivery-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:55:36 -0400
In-Reply-To: <200204220832.3229@th00.opsion.fr>; from Nicolas Boulay on Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 08:32:50AM +0000
References: <200204220832.3229@th00.opsion.fr>
Reply-To: f-cpu@seul.org
Sender: owner-f-cpu@seul.org

On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 08:32:50AM +0000, Nicolas Boulay wrote:
[...]
> >>> ??? 20 W for a register bank is hudge ! In 400 Mhz only 7W is needed
> for the whole mutiplier unit (0.18 痠).

You overlooked the clock frequency of *16* GHz.

-- 
 Michael "Tired" Riepe <Michael.Riepe@stud.uni-hannover.de>
 "All I wanna do is have a little fun before I die"
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu       in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rep:Re: [f-cpu] F-CPU vs. Itanium
  - From: nico <nicolas.boulay@ifrance.com>

References:
- Rep:Re: [f-cpu] F-CPU vs. Itanium
  - From: "Nicolas Boulay" <nicolas.boulay@ifrance.com>

Prev by Date: FORTH plusminus, was Re: [f-cpu] Winograd DCT on my seul.org account
Next by Date: Re: [f-cpu] F-CPU vs. Itanium
Prev by thread: Rep:Re: [f-cpu] F-CPU vs. Itanium
Next by thread: Re: Rep:Re: [f-cpu] F-CPU vs. Itanium
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread