Re: [f-cpu] Some question about the update

[Michael Riepe <michael@stud.uni-hannover.de>]

On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 01:40:45AM +0000, cedric wrote:
[...]
> > > 	Finally, did we add an new f2f instruction for FP conversions (32bits |
> > > 64bits -> 32 bits | 64 bits) ?
> >
> > We should.
> and f2f, is it a good name ?

Since we already have int2f/f2int and int2l/l2int, it's a perfect
match.

> > > About LNS: what are the rounding method (or mode) ? same as FPU ? And did
> > > we add 16 bits representation (like nicO suggestion ?) ?
> > >
> > > About memory, I didn't understand the problem with store[f] ? Can you
> > > explain it to me ? And did we add a new flag for a special immediate
> > > operand (6 bits value + 2 bits left-shift, as Michael suggest ?)
> >
> > I guess that was operand order... you can leave it as it is.
> Ok, and for 16 bits LNS number ?

Sorry, I don't remember.

[...]
> > Both `nor ...' and `xnor ...' are equivalent to the (non-existing)
> > `not r2, r1'.  Actually, there are a lot more ways to write `not'.
> Ok, but not one we prefer ?

None? You can mention two or three (and hope that it makes the reader
THINK about it).

-- 
 Michael "Tired" Riepe <Michael.Riepe@stud.uni-hannover.de>
 "All I wanna do is have a little fun before I die"
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu       in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/