[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: [f-cpu] GCC 3.1 for F-CPU port



hi,

(i'm trying to catch up)

>De: "Christophe Avoinne"
>
>Not a bad clue.
>
>But for 128-bit F-CPU instead of 64-bit, using ".q" would be clumsy.
>
>Why don't use something like :
>
>..l = long word, can be 64-bit or 128 bit or more
>..s = single word, always 32-bit
>..h = half word, always 16-bit
>..q/.b = quater word, byte, always 8-bit ?
>
>or :
>
>..l = 64/128/...
>..q = 4 bytes
>..d = 2 bytes
>..b = 1 bytes
> 
>using sufix like .8/.16/.32 is okay but .64 is wrong

why ?...

at least, using these numbers is not ambiguous at all.

YG

*************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu       in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/