Re: [f-cpu] vsprintf result for GCC & FCPU

["Christophe Avoinne" <christophe.avoinne@laposte.net>]

So it seems that option -Os has more inpact on f-cpu than intel
architecture.

----- Original Message -----
From: "devik" <devik@cdi.cz>
To: <f-cpu@seul.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2002 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: [f-cpu] vsprintf result for GCC & FCPU


> I did added other optimizations meanwhile so it
> dropped to 5272 with -O and 4888 with -Os.
>
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Christophe Avoinne wrote:
>
> > try with -Os
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "devik" <devik@cdi.cz>
> > To: <f-cpu@seul.org>
> > Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 2:29 PM
> > Subject: Re: [f-cpu] vsprintf result for GCC & FCPU
> >
> >
> > > > > I finnaly compiled vsprintf.c from Linux sources.
> > > > > There are still bugs but some stats:
> > > > >
> > > > > It is 3696 bytes of code for Intel Pentium.
> > > > > It is 5980 bytes for F-CPU.
> > > >
> > > > Not too bad, I guess. With or without -O?
> > >
> > > Both with -O2...
> > >
> > > *************************************************************
> > > To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
> > > unsubscribe f-cpu       in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/
> > *************************************************************
> > To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
> > unsubscribe f-cpu       in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/
> >
>
> *************************************************************
> To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
> unsubscribe f-cpu       in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/

*************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu       in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/