[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[f-cpu] back to VHDL
- To: fm <f-cpu@seul.org>
- Subject: [f-cpu] back to VHDL
- From: Yann Guidon <whygee@f-cpu.org>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 02:17:50 +0100
- Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-To: f-cpu-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-To: f-cpu@seul.org
- Delivery-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2002 20:13:15 -0500
- Organization: http://www.f-cpu.org
- Reply-To: f-cpu@seul.org
- Sender: owner-f-cpu@seul.org
Hello !
I just finished one of the building blocks of the register set,
namely a "slice" (8 or 16-b wide) of 63 registers. It is a generic
stuff that now simulates correclty. I also updated my "stable" tree
with Michael's modified version of "fanout_linear" that works
with Vanilla.
I have one question however : Can we "link" the SHL unit to the
LSU ? This would allow us to perform both endian and alignment
with few overhead and some flexibility : it would even allow
us to do "signed" loads, where the data is first aligned and
then sign-extended... This is often used for CPUs like ALPHA
and MIPS where data are handled only in a word-sized way.
what do people think ?
WHYGEE
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/