[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rep:Re: Rep:Re: Re: [f-cpu] No latches, please !

To: f-cpu@seul.org
Subject: Re: Rep:Re: Rep:Re: Re: [f-cpu] No latches, please !
From: Michael Riepe <michael@stud.uni-hannover.de>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 23:58:15 +0100
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: f-cpu-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-To: f-cpu@seul.org
Delivery-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 18:04:26 -0500
In-Reply-To: <200202151558.0b12@th00.opsion.fr>; from nicolas.boulay@ifrance.com on Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 03:58:11PM +0000
References: <200202151558.0b12@th00.opsion.fr>
Reply-To: f-cpu@seul.org
Sender: owner-f-cpu@seul.org

On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 03:58:11PM +0000, nicolas.boulay@ifrance.com wrote:
[...]
> >>>For large memory SRAM are much better !!

An SRAM cell is a kind of latch, essentially.
At least that's true for the ones I know.

-- 
 Michael "Tired" Riepe <Michael.Riepe@stud.uni-hannover.de>
 "All I wanna do is have a little fun before I die"
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu       in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rep:Re: Rep:Re: Re: [f-cpu] No latches, please !
  - From: nicO <nicolas.boulay@ifrance.com>

References:
- Rep:Re: Rep:Re: Re: [f-cpu] No latches, please !
  - From: <nicolas.boulay@ifrance.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Rep:Re: Re: [f-cpu] No latches, please !
Next by Date: Re: Rep:Re: Re: [f-cpu] No latches, please !
Prev by thread: Rep:Re: Rep:Re: Re: [f-cpu] No latches, please !
Next by thread: Re: Rep:Re: Rep:Re: Re: [f-cpu] No latches, please !
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread