[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [f-cpu] virtually or physically-addressed cache ?

To: <f-cpu@seul.org>
Subject: Re: [f-cpu] virtually or physically-addressed cache ?
From: "Marco Al" <marco@simplex.nl>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:58:22 +0100
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: f-cpu-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-To: f-cpu@seul.org
Delivery-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:58:24 -0500
References: <000901c1c061$872082a0$b1e1c2d4@ifurita>
Reply-To: f-cpu@seul.org
Sender: owner-f-cpu@seul.org

From: "Christophe" <christophe.avoinne@laposte.net>

> Virtual or physical addressing ?
> -------------------------------------------
> (1) virtually-addressed caches (virtual tags)
>
> + do address translation only on a cache miss
> + faster for hits because no address translation

Another plus to this method, its the only way to go with software managed
address translation AFAICS.

Marco

*************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu       in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [f-cpu] virtually or physically-addressed cache ?
  - From: "Christophe" <christophe.avoinne@laposte.net>
- Re: [f-cpu] virtually or physically-addressed cache ?
  - From: Yann Guidon <whygee@f-cpu.org>

References:
- [f-cpu] virtually or physically-addressed cache ?
  - From: "Christophe" <christophe.avoinne@laposte.net>

Prev by Date: [f-cpu] virtually or physically-addressed cache ?
Next by Date: Re: [f-cpu] virtually or physically-addressed cache ?
Prev by thread: [f-cpu] virtually or physically-addressed cache ?
Next by thread: Re: [f-cpu] virtually or physically-addressed cache ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread