[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [f-cpu] statistics of direct indexing usage

To: <f-cpu@seul.org>
Subject: Re: [f-cpu] statistics of direct indexing usage
From: devik <devik@cdi.cz>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 10:38:11 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: f-cpu-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: f-cpu@seul.org
Delivery-date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 05:12:31 -0500
In-reply-to: <20030108145002.15488@thrai.stud.uni-hannover.de>
Reply-to: f-cpu@seul.org
Sender: owner-f-cpu@seul.org

> >
> > hmm - why not, I have FFTW here from my latest accelerometer
> > analysis (http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/accel/ for interested).
> > Once I get time I'll test.
>
> I also have access to the CPU2000 sources (but I can't give them away).

hmm what is it ? :)

*************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu       in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [f-cpu] statistics of direct indexing usage
  - From: Michael Riepe <michael@stud.uni-hannover.de>

References:
- Re: [f-cpu] statistics of direct indexing usage
  - From: Michael Riepe <michael@stud.uni-hannover.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [f-cpu] GCC and jmpz vs. jmpl
Next by Date: Re: [f-cpu] latest gcc & immediate addressing [Was: BOUNCEf-cpu@seul.org:...] (fwd)
Previous by thread: Re: [f-cpu] statistics of direct indexing usage
Next by thread: Re: [f-cpu] statistics of direct indexing usage
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread