[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [f-cpu] Late answer
- To: f-cpu@seul.org
- Subject: Re: [f-cpu] Late answer
- From: Thomas Lavergne <thomas.lavergne@laposte.net>
- Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2002 23:38:03 +0200
- Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-To: f-cpu-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-To: f-cpu@seul.org
- Delivery-Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2002 18:08:01 -0400
- Organization: THallium Software
- References: <3D0FCF46.1584D826@f-cpu.org> <20020619154718.58467@thrai.stud.uni-hannover.de> <3D11517D.6123504@f-cpu.org> <20020620203042.39024@thrai.stud.uni-hannover.de> <3D125C82.7D96EAEF@f-cpu.org>
- Reply-To: f-cpu@seul.org
- Sender: owner-f-cpu@seul.org
- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
Hi all,
I come back and take a long time to read all message...
And more time to understand all :-)
In the discution about loadcons, personnaly I agree with Michael Riepe
solution, because it's possibly a bit more difficult to implement in
hardware side (but I'm not sure... ) but it's a lot simpler and more
powerfull in software side.
And personnaly I think that the design of a cpu is to find a good middle
between software and hardware.
If you look at the x86 architecture, it was designed by hardware man,
and look at the 68000 it was designed by software man, and all have
problems, I think we must keep the two side in mind.
Thanks for your attention.
Tom
PS: I've not used BabelFish but I'm not sure the result was better :-)
--
Thomas Lavergne "Le vrai rêveur est celui qui rêve
de l'impossible." (Elsa Triolet)
thomas.lavergne@laposte.net
d-12@laposte.net ICQ:#137121910 http://assoc.wanadoo.fr/thallium/
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/